April 7, 2004 By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 11:07 a.m. ET
INGLEWOOD, Calif. (AP) -- Voters rejected a ballot measure
that would have cleared the way for a colossal Wal Mart in
this Los Angeles suburb, one of several communities across
the nation to resist the retailer's advances.
Activists who opposed the measure -- which would have
allowed Wal Mart to skirt zoning, traffic and environmental
reviews -- said it would hurt the community by inviting the
Supercenter to drive out small business and encourage
sprawl.
With all 29 precincts and absentee ballots counted late
Tuesday night, Inglewood voters opposed the measure 60.6
percent to 39.3 percent, said Gabby Contreras of the city
clerk's office.
The tally was 7,049 votes against the initiative and 4,575
in favor. Contreras said there are about 40,000 registered
voters in the city.
``This is very, very positive for those folks who want to
stand up and ... hold this corporate giant responsible,''
said Daniel Tabor, a former City Council member who had
campaigned against the initiative.
Debate raged for weeks in this working-class community.
Opponents said passage would clear the way for Wal-Mart to
build a combination supermarket-retail store next to
Hollywood Park racetrack.
The City Council last year blocked the proposed shopping
center, which would include both a traditional Wal-Mart and
other stores -- prompting the Bentonville, Ark.-based
company to collect more than 10,000 signatures to force the
vote.
In a statement, the company said the decision means
Inglewood residents will have to go elsewhere to shop at
Wal-Mart.
``We are disappointed that a small group of Inglewood
leaders together with representatives of outside special
interests were able to convince a majority of Inglewood
voters that they don't deserve the job opportunities and
shopping choices that others in the LA area enjoy,'' the
company said.
Wal-Mart had argued in Inglewood and elsewhere in
California that its stores create jobs and said residents
should be able to decide for themselves whether they want
the stores in their community.
But opponents argued the Supercenters amount to low-wage,
low-benefit job mills that displace better-paying jobs as
independent retailers are driven out of business. They also
fear the super-sized stores will contribute to suburban
sprawl and jammed roadways.
Objections to Wal-Mart Stores Inc. have surfaced elsewhere
around the country, including Chicago, where the City
Council recently stalled a measure to approve the first
Wal-Mart inside city limits because of concerns about the
company's labor practices.
The company succeeded in lobbying residents in Contra Costa
County, where residents voted last month to allow a
Supercenter. But Wal-Mart also lost a vote that day to
allow it to open another store near San Diego.
Wal-Mart had spent more than $1 million in its Inglewood
campaign, according to campaign finance records, while
opponents spent a fraction of that amount.
Alversia Carmouche, a beauty shop owner who voted against
the measure Tuesday, said she was convinced the behemoth
discount store would ultimately hurt the community.
``Maybe the store would possibly be a good thing in the
beginning, but it will drive out the smaller businesses,''
said Carmouche, 66. ``I really feel it will absolutely
close this town out.''